Comments: 4
*****************************************************
Public: ON
topic: IP Addresses
zipcode: 60178
Date: Tuesday October 11, 2005
Time: 06:41 PM -0400
Comment:
Your polls are 100% meaningless. It's a cute idea to use the IP addresses to make it look legit but it can be easily manipulated. All a person would have to do is vote, disconnect their internet connection, then reconnect it 5 mins later and they have a new IP address. This takes all of 10 seconds with a dial up connection. The poll is a nice way to manipulate people who are not computer savvy.
On 10/11/05, Mac McIntyre wrote:
Thanks for visiting my website.
The reason I record the IP address is for security purposes. From the IP address I am able to track down who the ISP is and when abuse occurs they are able to pinpoint which subscriber is in question.
Your IP address of [omitted] is static (does not change) as are most broadband or cable connections. Random IP addresses are usually dial-up connections unless masked.
Thanks again for visiting DeKalb County Online.
Mac McIntyre, Publisher
From: PJ
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:44 PM
To: Mac McIntyre
Subject: Re: IP Addresses
I really hate to burst your bubble but my IP address is not static, it is dynamic. I do have the same IP address all the time because I have a wireless router that automatically renews the number every couple days, but if I unplug the modem, I will get a new IP address. My IP used to be [omitted], bottom line is the polls are misleading.
From: Mac McIntyre
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:23 PM
To: 'PJ'
Subject: RE: IP Addresses
Hello PJ…
You are correct regarding dynamic versus static. I was not. You are of course entitled to your opinion and if you would be so kind to tell me which polls you are referring to I will publish your comments.
Mac
From: PJ
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:26 PM
To: Mac McIntyre
Subject: Re: IP Addresses
Mac,
I am talking about the article "This Poll was Rigged" and the polls "Growth Quiz Poll Results" besides the IP address issue. Also, their were only 88 people in the poll, their are over 14,000 people in Sycamore alone and the poll is supposed to represent the county. And I am not sure where the polls were posted for people to vote but if it was on a persons personal website or any kind of bias site of course your going to get lopsided results. I just find the backbone of the article to be these polls and the polls aren't worth the text it took to type them. PJ
From: PJ
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 12:26 AM
To: Mac McIntyre
Subject: Comments on website Mr. Intyre, we have e-mailed back and forth a few times and a week or so ago you had told me you would post my comments regarding your article on "This Poll was Rigged!." I recently checked your website and have not seen my comments posted nor my comments on 2 or 3 other articles of yours and was wondering if their was a particular reason for this. Incase you forgot or no longer have our e-mails, I have decided to e-mail you my comments regarding "This Poll was Rigged!" again. {emails posted above)
editor's note:
PJ...
I would suggest to you that the title of this 'rant', "This Poll was Rigged," is indicative that my poll was, well, errr... rigged. The poll was posted on this website and I do have a bias... I am pro-growth. I deliberately designed the poll to get exactly the answers I wanted. Just like Eban Fodor. That's the whole point I was trying to make, but, I obviously didn't get the job done.
I posted your comments regarding the "No Moore in DeKalb" and the St. John's Park rants on the respective pages. Thanks again for visiting the site and sending in your comments.
Mac McIntyre, Publisher
|